Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al

Filing 1028

ORDER of June 7, 2012. Signed by the Honorable Richard A. Posner on 6/7/2012:Judicial staff mailed notice(gl, )

Download PDF
UNITEDȱSTATESȱDISTRICTȱCOURTȱFORȱTHEȱ NORTHERNȱDISTRICTȱOFȱILLINOISȱ EASTERNȱDIVISIONȱ ________________ȱ ȱ APPLEȱINC.ȱandȱNeXTȱSOFTWAREȱ )ȱ INC.ȱ(f/k/aȱNeXTȱCOMPUTER,ȱINC.),ȱ )ȱ ȱ ȱ )ȱ ȱ Plaintiffs,ȱ )ȱȱȱȱȱ ȱ No.ȱ1:11ȬcvȬ08540ȱ ȱ )ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱv.ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ)ȱ ȱ )ȱȱȱȱ JudgeȱRichardȱA.ȱPosner.ȱ MOTOROLA,ȱINC.ȱandȱMOTOROLAȱ )ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ MOBILITY,ȱINC.,ȱ )ȱ ȱ )ȱ ȱ Defendants.ȱ )ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ORDERȱOFȱJUNEȱ7,ȱ2012ȱ ȱ Onȱtheȱbasisȱofȱtheȱmotionsȱfiledȱbyȱtheȱpartiesȱregardingȱdamages,ȱinjunctiveȱandȱdeȬ claratoryȱ relief,ȱ andȱ mootness,ȱ andȱ theȱ parties’ȱ filingsȱ thisȱ morningȱ addressedȱ toȱ theseȱ mattersȱ andȱ theȱ hearingȱ heldȱ thisȱ afternoon,ȱ Iȱ haveȱ tentativelyȱ decidedȱ thatȱ theȱ caseȱ shouldȱbeȱdismissedȱwithȱprejudiceȱbecauseȱneitherȱpartyȱcanȱestablishȱaȱrightȱtoȱrelief.ȱ TheȱtrialȱscheduledȱtoȱbeginȱthisȱcomingȱMondayȱisȱthereforeȱcanceled.ȱButȱIȱwillȱdelayȱ entryȱ ofȱ judgmentȱ untilȱ Iȱ haveȱ preparedȱ aȱ fullȱ opinion,ȱ becauseȱ inȱ theȱ courseȱ ofȱ thatȱ preparationȱIȱmayȱchangeȱmyȱmind.ȱIȱwillȱmerelyȱsketchȱtheȱgroundsȱforȱmyȱtentativeȱ viewȱveryȱbrieflyȱinȱthisȱorder.ȱ ȱ Appleȱconcedesȱthat,ȱinȱlightȱofȱmyȱOrderȱofȱMayȱ22,ȱ2012,ȱrulingȱonȱtheȱDaubertȱmotionȱ filedȱbyȱMotorola,ȱitȱcannotȱproveȱdamagesȱforȱtheȱallegedȱinfringementȱofȱtheȱ‘002ȱandȱ ‘949ȱpatents.ȱThatȱleavesȱAppleȱwithȱjustȱitsȱclaimsȱforȱinfringementȱofȱtheȱ‘263ȱandȱ‘647ȱ patents.ȱ Iȱ tentativelyȱ concludeȱ thatȱ itsȱ admissibleȱ evidenceȱ ofȱ damagesȱ withȱ respectȱ toȱ thoseȱclaimsȱdoesȱnotȱcreateȱaȱgenuineȱissueȱofȱmaterialȱfactȱenablingȱitȱtoȱwithstandȱMoȬ torola’sȱmotionȱforȱsummaryȱjudgment.ȱIȱlikewiseȱtentativelyȱconcludeȱthatȱtheȱadmissiȬ bleȱ evidenceȱ ofȱ damagesȱ withȱ respectȱ toȱ theȱ allegedȱ infringementȱ byȱ Appleȱ ofȱ MoȬ torola’sȱ‘898ȱpatentȱalsoȱfailsȱtoȱcreateȱaȱgenuineȱissueȱofȱmaterialȱfact.ȱ ȱ No.ȱ1:11ȬcvȬ08540ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ2 Thatȱleavesȱonlyȱtheȱparties’ȱclaimsȱtoȱinjunctiveȱreliefȱagainstȱtheȱallegedȱinfringements.ȱ Becauseȱ theȱ partiesȱ believeȱ thatȱ damagesȱ areȱ anȱ adequateȱ remedyȱ forȱ theȱ allegedȱ inȬ fringementsȱ(thoughȱtheyȱfailedȱtoȱpresentȱevidenceȱonȱdamagesȱstrongȱenoughȱtoȱwithȬ standȱsummaryȱjudgment),ȱandȱbecauseȱinjunctiveȱreliefȱwouldȱimposeȱcostsȱdisproporȬ tionateȱtoȱtheȱharmȱtoȱtheȱpatenteeȱandȱtheȱbenefitȱofȱtheȱallegedȱinfringementȱtoȱtheȱalȬ legedȱinfringerȱandȱwouldȱbeȱcontraryȱtoȱtheȱpublicȱinterest,ȱIȱcannotȱfindȱaȱbasisȱforȱanȱ awardȱofȱinjunctiveȱrelief.ȱAppleȱurgesȱmeȱtoȱholdȱaȱfullȱevidentiaryȱhearingȱonȱitsȱclaimȱ forȱinjunctiveȱrelief.ȱTheȱrequestȱwasȱmadeȱforȱtheȱfirstȱtimeȱatȱthisȱafternoon’sȱhearing,ȱ afterȱtheȱpartiesȱhadȱfullyȱbriefedȱtheȱquestionȱofȱentitlementȱtoȱinjunctiveȱrelief;ȱinȱanyȱ eventȱIȱthinkȱtheȱexistingȱevidentiaryȱrecordȱisȱadequate.ȱ ȱ Appleȱseeksȱdeclaratoryȱreliefȱasȱanȱalternativeȱtoȱinjunctiveȱrelief;ȱIȱdoȱnotȱbelieveȱthatȱitȱ hasȱanyȱrightȱtoȱdeclaratoryȱrelief,ȱbutȱifȱitȱdidȱIȱwouldȱbeȱstronglyȱinclinedȱtoȱexerciseȱ myȱ discretionȱ toȱ denyȱ itȱ suchȱ reliefȱ inȱ lightȱ ofȱ myȱ rulingȱ thatȱ itȱ hasȱ failedȱ toȱ proveȱ itsȱ damagesȱandȱinjunctionȱcases.ȱ ȱ Butȱallȱthisȱrequiresȱaȱfullerȱexplanation,ȱwhichȱIȱwillȱendeavorȱtoȱprovideȱinȱmyȱopinȬ ion;ȱIȱexpectȱtoȱissueȱitȱwithinȱaȱweek.ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ UnitedȱStatesȱCircuitȱJudgeȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ ȱ Juneȱ7,ȱ2012ȱ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.