Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC v. Forest River Inc
MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC, Counter Defendant Heartland Recreational Vehicles LLC. (Irmscher, David)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of Indiana South Bend Division HEARTLAND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. FOREST RIVER, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CASE NO.: 3:08-cv-490 JD
HEARTLAND'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Forest River, Inc. ("Forest River") asserts three counterclaims against Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC ("Heartland"): (1) inequitable conduct in the prosecution of U.S. Patent No. 7,278,650; (2) "passing off" or "palming off" in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(A); and (3) criminal deception in violation of Ind. Code §§ 35-43-5-3(6) & 34-24-3-1. The arguments and evidence in support of this Motion are set forth in the Memorandum and Statement of Undisputed Material Facts filed herewith. No issue of material fact exists with respect to any of Forest River's counterclaims, and Heartland is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).
BAKER & DANIELS LLP
/s/ David P. Irmscher David P. Irmscher (#15026-02) Abigail M. Butler (#22295-02) Peter A. Meyer (#27968-53) 111 East Wayne, Suite 800 Fort Wayne, Indiana 46802 Tel: 260.424.8000 Fax: 260.460.1700 firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF, HEARTLAND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, LLC
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned counsel for plaintiff Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC, hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing was served upon the following, this 2nd day of November, 2010, by operation of the Court's electronic filing system: Ryan M. Fountain 420 Lincoln Way West Mishawaka, Indiana 46544-1902
/s/ David P. Irmscher David P. Irmscher
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.