Opower, Inc. v. Efficiency 2.0, LLC
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Opower, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Karol, Peter)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
EFFICIENCY 2.0, LLC
Civil Action No.______________
Oral Argument Requested
PLAINTIFF OPOWER, INC.’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Plaintiff Opower, Inc., pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, hereby moves this Court to issue a
preliminary injunction against Defendant, Efficiency 2.0, LLC, to restrain and enjoin Defendant
from infringing Plaintiff’s copyrights by producing, distributing, displaying, advertising, or
promoting its infringing “Energy Savings Report” or any other work that infringes Plaintiff’s
copyrighted works, or any work substantially similar thereto or derived therefrom. A proposed
form of order is attached hereto for the convenience of the Court.
In support of this motion, Plaintiff relies upon the Memorandum of Law in Support of
Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the Declarations of Steven W. Ramsdell, Justin
Rodgers, Daniel Yates, and Alex Laskey, and the Appendix of Exhibits filed herewith.
REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
Plaintiff respectfully requests oral argument on the instant motion.
Dated: November 14, 2011
By Its Attorneys,
/s/Peter J. Karol/
Jack C. Schecter (BBO# 652349)
Peter J. Karol (BBO# 660338)
Nicole Rizzo Smith (BBO# 663853)
SUNSTEIN KANN MURPHY &
125 Summer Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02110
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that the above document is being filed contemporaneously with
Complaint in this action, and a true and correct copy of the above document will be served by
hand upon Efficiency 2.0 along with service of the Complaint on November 15, 2011.
/s/ Peter J. Karol/
Peter J. Karol
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.