United States of America- Department of Veterans Affairs v. Rohr et al
ORDER that the plaintiff shall take appropriate action against the defendants or show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute on or before the close of business May 25, 2010. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (JSF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) RICKY E. ROHR and ) UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF RICKY E. ROHR, ) ) Defendants. )
This matter is before the court sua sponte, pursuant to NECivR 41.2, which states in pertinent part: "At any time, a case not being prosecuted with reasonable diligence may be dismissed for lack of prosecution." On April 7, 2010, a clerk's entry of default was entered against both defendants. See Filing No. 14. The defendants have failed to enter an appearance or seek for the clerk's entry of default to be set aside. Further, the plaintiff has failed to take any additional action against the defendants. In any event, it remains the plaintiff's duty to go forward in prosecuting the case by, for example, filing a motion for entry of judgment against the defendants, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) and NECivR 55.1(b) or (c). Alternatively, the plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss the action against the defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) or be subject to involuntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Upon consideration,
IT IS ORDERED: The plaintiff shall take appropriate action against the defendants or show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute on or before the close of business May 25, 2010. DATED this 11th day of May, 2010. BY THE COURT:
s/Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.