In re Karen J. Anthony

Filing 16

ORDER - This disciplinary matter is referred to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska pursuant to NEGenR 1.8(a)(2). The Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska shall deliver, or send ele ctronically, the appellant's attorney discipline complaint to the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy of Order and Original Pleading to USBC-Nebraska as directed) (Copy mailed to pro se party) (TEL) Modified on 9/6/2012 to include mailing information. (TEL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA 4:12-CV-3126 IN THE MATTER OF: KAREN J. ANTHONY, BANKRUPTCY NO. BK11-42232 ORDER Debtor. The appellant, Karen J. Anthony, has filed an attorney discipline complaint regarding Todd R. Mulliner, attorney for Edenton North Home Owner's Association. Pursuant to NEGenR 1.8(a)(2), "[i]n an open or closed bankruptcy case, the assignment will be to the bankruptcy judge except where the alleged disciplinary violation occurred before a district judge (as in appeals or otherwise) and in that circumstance the assignment will be to the district judge." In this case, the conduct complained of—the filing of Edenton North's bankruptcy claim—occurred before the bankruptcy judge. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED: 1. This disciplinary matter is referred to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska pursuant to NEGenR 1.8(a)(2); 2. The Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska shall deliver, or send electronically, the appellant's attorney discipline complaint to the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska. Dated this 6th day of September, 2012. BY THE COURT: John M. Gerrard United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.