Secalt S.A. et al v. Wuxi Shenxi Construction Machinery Company, Ltd.

Filing 173

ORDER that Motions to Seal 129 , 144 , 150 , 152 , 158 , and 165 are GRANTED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/21/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
Secalt S.A. et al v. Wuxi Shenxi Construction Machinery Company, Ltd. Doc. 173 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge SECALT S.A. and TRACTEL, INC., Plaintiffs, v. WUXI SHENXI CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY CO., LTD., Defendant. 2:08-CV-336 JCM (GWF ) ORDER Presently before the court defendant is Wuxi Shenzi Construction Machinery Co.'s motion to file exhibits Exhibits 1-3, 13, and 16-24 under seal (doc. #129). Also before the court is plaintiffs Secalt S.A.'s and Tractel, Inc.'s request to file under seal portions of their motion for summary judgment (doc. # 144), defendant's motion to seal Exhibit 1 (doc. # 150), defendant's motion to seal portions of plaintiffs' motion in limine and plaintiffs' opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment (doc. # 152), defendant's motion to seal (doc. # 158), plaintiffs' motion to seal motion exhibit in support of defendant's opposition to plaintiff's motion to exclude Dr. Cagan (doc. # 165). These motions being unopposed and in furtherance of a stipulated protective order entered on July 13, 2009, this court finds good cause to seal the filings noted above. ... ... ... ... Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that docket ## 129, 144, 150, 152, 158, and 165 are GRANTED. DATED July 21, 2010. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.