McCoy v. Astrue
ORDER that Plaintiff shall file her Certificate of Interested Parties by 12/15/2010. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/30/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
McCoy v. Astrue
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The Complaint (Dkt. #1) in this matter was filed November 10, 2010. No Answer has been filed. LR 7.1-1(a) requires, unless otherwise ordered, that in all cases (except habeas corpus cases) pro se litigants and counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, identify in the disclosure statement required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 all persons, associations of persons, firms, partnerships or corporations (including parent corporations) which have a direct, pecuniary interest in the outcome of the case. LR 7.1-1(b) further states that if there are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. Additionally, LR 7.1-1(c) requires a party to promptly file a supplemental certification upon any change in the information that this rule requires. To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff shall file her Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 4:00 p.m., December 15, 2010. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Dated this 30th day of November, 2010. ___________________________________ PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE LINDA R. MCCOY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case No. 2:10-cv-01972-RLH-PAL ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.