Adamson et al v. United States of America, Departmment of the Interior through its Bureau of Reclamation

Filing 386

ORDER - The following motions are DENIED without prejudice subject to their reinstatement by the court in the due course of the aforementioned proceedings: Uhouse v. Bureau of Reclamation , 3:08-cv-0285-LDG : Plaintiffs' motion to reconsider the magistrate judges order denying plaintiffs' motion to enforce settlement (#428) Adamson v. United States , 3:08-cv-0621-LDG : Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#212) Moore v. Unite d States , 3:09-cv-0167-LDG : Motion to set date for trial (#215) Adgett v. United States , 3:09-cv-0649-LDG : Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#147), and Motion to set a date for trial (#157) Adams on v. United States , 3:09-cv-0715-LDG : Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (# 149 ), and Renewed motion to dismiss claims of 168 enumerated plaintiffs as untimely (# 166 ) Ames v. United States , 3:10-cv-0463-LDG : Motion to set a date for trial (#108) Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 3/27/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 JUDY KROSHUS, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, 9 v. 10 3:08-cv-0246-LDG-RAM (Kroshus I) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 ALICIA UHOUSE, et al., 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 3:08-cv-0285-LDG-RAM THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 BILL ADAMSON, et al., 3:08-cv-0621-LDG-RAM (Adamson I) 18 Plaintiffs, 19 v. 20 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 21 Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 1 1 LARRY J. MOORE, et al., 2 Plaintiffs, 3 v. 4 3:09-cv-0167-LDG-RAM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 5 Defendants. 6 7 JAMES ADGETT, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 9 10 3:09-cv-0649-LDG-RAM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. 11 JUDY KROSHUS, et al., 3:09-cv-0713-LDG-RAM (Kroshus II) 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 BILL ADAMSON, et al., 17 18 19 3:09-cv-0715-LDG-RAM (Adamson II) Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 20 Defendant. 21 JASON AMES, et al., 22 Plaintiffs, 23 v. 24 3:10-cv-0463-LDG-RAM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 25 Defendant. 26 2 1 2 In conformity with the previously announced subdivision of pending motions, and in the further interests of case management of this litigation, 3 THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the following motions are DENIED without 4 prejudice subject to their reinstatement by the court in the due course of the aforementioned 5 proceedings: 6 Uhouse v. Bureau of Reclamation, 3:08-cv-0285-LDG 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider the magistrate judge’s order denying plaintiffs’ motion to enforce settlement (#428) Adamson v. United States, 3:08-cv-0621-LDG Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#212) Moore v. United States, 3:09-cv-0167-LDG Motion to set date for trial (#215) Adgett v. United States, 3:09-cv-0649-LDG 14 Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#147) 15 Motion to set a date for trial (#157) 16 Adamson v. United States, 3:09-cv-0715-LDG 17 Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#149) 18 Renewed motion to dismiss claims of 168 enumerated plaintiffs as untimely (#166) 19 Ames v. United States, 3:10-cv-0463-LDG 20 Motion to set a date for trial (#108) 21 22 DATED this ______ day of March, 2013. 23 24 ______________________________ Lloyd D. George United States District Judge 25 26 3