Palo v. Hillsborough County Department of Corrections, Superintendent
ORDER granting 2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis as to Jacob E. Palo, initial fee of $7.00. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty.Finance Follow Up Deadline 2/11/2013(jeb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Jacob E. Palo
Civil No. 12-cv-407-JD
Hillsborough County Department
of Corrections, Superintendent
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED
IN FORMA PAUPERIS
The plaintiff, an inmate at Hillsborough County Department of Corrections (“Institution”),
has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and an inmate account statement signed by an
authorized individual from the Institution. The statement evidences that the plaintiff’s current
balance is $35.01. Plaintiff has also submitted a signed consent form indicating consent to permit
inmate accounts to make court-ordered payments on his behalf.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; however, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(b)(1), an initial filing fee is assessed in the amount of $7.00. In addition, monthly
payments of 20% of each preceding month’s income credited to the plaintiff’s account shall be
remitted by the Institution when the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the sum of $350.00
has been paid. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
The initial partial filing fee, and monthly payments thereafter as outlined above, shall be
forwarded to the Clerk of Court by the Institution in accordance with this Order. A copy of this
Order, along with a copy of the signed Prisoner Consent Form (doc. no. 2), shall be forwarded by
the Court to the Institutions inmate account department.
Landya B. McCafferty
United States Magistrate Judge
Dated: December 13, 2012
cc: Jacob E. Palo, pro se
Hillsborough County Department of Corrections Inmate Accounts
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.