Association For Molecular Pathology et al v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
MOTION to File Amicus Brief in Support of Plaintiffs. Document filed by The International Center for Technology Assessment.(Risk, Mark)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, et al., Defendants.
09-CV-4515 (RWS) ECF
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that proposed Amici Curiae the International Center for Technology Assessment, the Indigenous Peoples Council on Bicolonialism, Greenpeace, and the Council for Responsible Genetics shall move this Court, before the Honorable Robert W. Sweet, United States District Judge, at the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York at a date and time to be determined by the court, for leave to file a brief amicus curiae. Attached hereto are: (1) Memorandum of Law in Support of this Motion for Leave to File a proposed brief amicus curiae, (2) proposed Order granting leave to file the proposed brief amicus curiae, and (3) the proposed brief amicus curiae.
Respectfully submitted, Dated: September 10, 2009 /s/Andrew Kimbrell__________ Andrew Kimbrell George Kimbrell (pending pro hac vice) Zelig Golden The International Center for Technology Assessment 660 Pennsylvania Ave., Suite 302 Washington, D.C. 20003 202-547-9359 (phone) 202-547-9429 (fax) firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org
/s/ Mark D. Risk Mark Risk, P.C. (mdr 5823) Local Counsel for Amicus Curiae 60 East 42nd Street, 47th Floor New York, New York 10165 (212) 682-4100 Counsel for Amicus Curiae the International Center for Technology Assessment, Indigenous Peoples Council on Bicolonialism, Greenpeace, and the Council for Responsible Genetics
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.