Ceglia v. Zuckerberg et al
DECLARATION signed by Paul Ceglia re 229 Memorandum in Support, 228 MOTION Order Prohibiting Defendants' Reliance on Inadmissible Evidence in Any Dispositive Motion NOTICE OF MOTION for Order Prohibiting Defendants Reliance on Inadmissible Evidence in Any Dispositive Motion filed by Paul D. Ceglia. (Boland, Dean)
UNITED STATES DISTzuCT COUKT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
PAUL D. CEGLIA,
Civil Action No. : l:10-cv-00569-RJA
OF PAUL CEGLIA IN SUPPORT OF
MARK ELLIOT ZUCKERBERG Individually, and FACEBOOK,INC.
MOTION TO PROHIBIT DEFENDANTS' RELIANCE ON ALLEGED
EMAIL BETWEEN CEGLIA AND
KOLE INANY DISPOSITTVE MOTION
PAUL CEGLIA, submits this declaration and hereby declares under penalty of perjury
and pursuant to 28 U.S.C
. 1746 and under the laws of the United States that the following is true
I make this declaration upon personal knowledge.
I am the Plaintiffin this matter.
During Expedited Discovery I became aware of a claim by Defendants'that they found an
email supposedly authored and sent by me to Jim Kole. ExhibitA.
I am also aware that Defendants claim this email contained
an attachment which is an un-
authenticated digital image of what purports to be a two page document signed by myself
and Mr. Zuckerberg. Exhibit B.
Jim Kole was an attorney working with me back in 2003 and 2004 regarding various issues
including the Street Fax business.
I have seen the supposed email referenced above. Exhibit A.
I do not recall authoring or sending the above referenced email to Jim Kole.
I have seen
of the unauthenticated digital image referenced above. Exhibit B.
In March of 2Al1 I found this unauthenticated digital image, read it, and with an abundance
of caution, Iturneditoverindiscovery. PriortoMarchof 2011 Ihadneverbeforeseen
10. I signed the contract with Mr. Zuckerberg
that was attached to the Complaint in this case
which included the terms relating to Facebook as they appear on page one of that contract.
I signed a six page software specification agreement with Mr. Zuckerberg
The unauthenticated digital image Defendants intend to rely on in this case that is referenced above, appears to have an identical page two to the Facebook Contract attached to
the Complaint, however,
to have a different page one that has been substituted
into that document by someone.
The email account allegedly used to allegedly send this email was email@example.com.
I have never owned nor had the username or password to any such account.
I am aware that my father had an email account with the name firstname.lastname@example.org.
16. I do not recall ever sending
an email to anyone using the email@example.com email ac-
In 2003 and 2004I am aware that my father used the same password for all his accounts
for ease of recalling his passwords.
18. My father also had an account with my Street Fax business and that account information
was stored on the Street Fax business computers.
part of his work for Street Fax, had administrative access to all Street-
Fax user accounts, including that of my father.
24. That necessarily means, Mark Zuckerberg
had access to the username and password of my
father's Street Fax user account which is the identical email address and password my fa-
ther used for his cegLia@adelphia.net email account at that time.
Mark Zuckerberg, therefore, had all the credentials necessary to access and to send and receive email via my father's firstname.lastname@example.org email account at the time this unauthenticated email with its unauthenticated digital image was allegedly transmitted.
and hereby declare under penalty of perjury and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746 and
under the laws of the United States that the following is true and correct: