Pitman v. Bayer Corporation et al
ORDER granting 9 Motion to Stay Proceedings pending transfer by the Judicial Panel on MDL; granting 11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re 5 Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 10/19/10. (nll)
- D L H Pitman et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
D o c . 18
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA A S H E V IL L E DIVISION 1 :1 0 cv 1 9 6 M . P., minor by and through her G u a rd ia n Ad Litem, GREGORY P IT M A N , et al., P l a i n t if f , V s. B A Y E R CORPORATION, et al., D efen d a n ts. _______________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
T H IS MATTER is before the court on the consent Motion to Stay Proceedings a n d consent Motion to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint. Having considered th e consent motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.
ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the consent Motion to Stay
P ro ceed in g s (#9) and consent Motion to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint ( # 1 1 ) are GRANTED, all proceedings in this matter are STAYED pending transfer b y the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, and defendants are allowed up to and in clu siv e of the time that may be directed by the MDL Panel to so Answer or o th e r w is e respond to the Complaint or 30 days from any Order denying transfer, w h ic h e v e r is later.
Signed: October 19, 2010