| Court | Ohio Northern District Court |
| Judge | James G. Carr |
| Lawsuit Type | Trademark |
| Filing | 24 |
| Filed | June 4, 2007 |
Document Description
Order: YouTube's motion to dismiss Universal's second amended complaint is granted, without prejudice, with respect to Universal's: Second Claim for Relief (Cancellation of
YouTubes Trademark Applications); Fourth Claim for Relief (Trespass to Chattels); Fifth Claim for Relief (Nuisance); Sixth Claim for Relief (Negligence) and Eighth Claim for Relief
(Violation of Ohios RICO Act). YouTube's motion to dismiss Universal's second amended complaint is denied with respect to Universal's: First Claim for Relief (Unfair
Competition);Third Claim for Relief (Dilution Under Ohio Law) and Seventh Claim for Relief (Deceptive Trade Practices). (Related Doc # 14). Signed by Judge James G. Carr on
6/4/2007.(S,AL)
Link/Embed this Document
| URL | |
| Embed | |
| Download |
 Download PDF
|