WASSERSON v. I-LINK CORP. et al

Filing 68

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART. FINAL JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN A SUM CERTAIN AMOUNT OF $404,896.75, IN FAVOR OF WASSERSON, THE PREVAILING PARTY, AGAINST DEFENDANTS COUNSEL CORPORATION, COUNSEL CORPORATION (US), ALAN SILBER, AND I-LINK. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 8/24/10. 8/25/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
WASSERSON v. I-LINK CORP. et al Doc. 68 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COUNSEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff v. GARY J. WASSERSON, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION No. 04-cv-3852 GARY J. WASSERSON, Plaintiff ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION v. ) No. 04-cv-3864 ) I-LINK CORP., et al. ) Defendants ) ______________________________________________________________________________ FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER AND NOW, this 24th day of August 2010, upon review and consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment and Award of Attorneys' Fees [docket entry No. 62], Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment and Award of Attorneys' Fees [docket entry No. 63], Plaintiff's Reply [docket entry No. 66], and for reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part. Final Judgment is hereby entered in a sum certain amount of $404,896.75, in favor of Wasserson, the prevailing party, against Defendants Counsel Corporation, Counsel Corporation (US), C2 Global Technologies, Inc., and Alan Silber as follows: 1. $715,717.22 to Wasserson, with a deduction for the award to Defendants I-Link, et Dockets.Justia.com al., in the amount of $310.820.47, for a net judgment in favor of Wasserson in the amount of $404,896.75. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe __________________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.