COLES et al v. RITZ CARLTON RESIDENCE et al

Filing 22

ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 4) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS ARE GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE AND SERVE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 20 DAYS. IF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IS FILED, DEFENDANTS SHALL FILE AND SERVE THEIR RESPONSES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FEDERAL AND LOCAL RULES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 6/12/2013. 6/14/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (aeg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTHONY COLES and MICHAEL CASINO v. RITZ CARLTON RESIDENCE and RESIDENCE CONDOMINIUM : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-1461 ORDER AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2013, upon consideration of plaintiffs’ first amended complaint (paper no. 3), defendants’ motion to dismiss (paper no. 4), plaintiffs’ response in opposition (paper no. 10), and defendants’ reply brief (paper no. 15), following a conference under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 held on May 13, 2013, at which the parties were heard, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED that: 1. The motion to dismiss (paper no. 4) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiffs are given leave to file and serve a second amended complaint stating a plausible claim of contract interference under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 within twenty (20) days of this order. 3. If an amended complaint is filed, defendants shall file and serve their responses in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this court. /s/ Norma L. Shapiro J.