COLES et al v. RITZ CARLTON RESIDENCE et al
ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 10/29/2013. 10/31/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANTHONY COLES and
RITZ CARLTON RESIDENCE and
AGC PARTNERS, LP
AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2013, upon consideration of plaintiffs’ second
amended complaint (paper no. 25), defendants’ motion to dismiss (paper no. 26), plaintiffs’
response in opposition (paper no. 27), and defendants’ reply brief (paper no. 30), and for the
reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss
(paper no. 26) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (paper no. 25) is
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
/s/ Norma L. Shapiro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.