John Beck Amazing Profits, LLC v. Google Inc. et al
Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by John Beck Amazing Profits, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Glasscock, Harold)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION THE RODNEY A. HAMILTON LIVING TRUST AND JOHN BECK AMAZING PROFITS, LLC, INIDIVIDUALLY AND BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED V. GOOGLE, INC.; ET AL § § § § § § § § §
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-CV-00151 Class Action Complaint Jury
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF THE RODNEY A. HAMILTON LIVING TRUST AND JOHN BECK AMAZING PROFITS, LLC, INIDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
Plaintiff The Rodney A. Hamilton Living Trust and John Beck Amazing Profits, LLC, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated ("Beck"), files this The Rodney A. Hamilton Living Trust and John Beck Amazing Profits, LLC, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, and respectfully requests that attorney Kip Glasscock be permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Beck in the abovecaptioned matter. Plaintiff Beck consents to this request, and said Plaintiff is currently represented by other counsel in this matter. No other changes are requested at this time regarding the other attorneys acting as said Plaintiffs' counsel of record. Defendants do not oppose this motion. Dated: April 22, 2010 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Kip Glasscock Kip Glasscock Texas State Bar No. 08011000 Kip Glasscock P.C. 550 Fannin, Suite 1350 Beaumont, TX 77701 Tel: (409) 833-8822 Fax: (409) 838-4666 Email: email@example.com Attorney for Plaintiff
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are being served this 22nd day of April, 2010, with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system in accordance with Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). /s/ Kip Glasscock Kip Glasscock
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.