Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Docket Control and Discovery Orders by Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bunt, Robert)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION § § Plaintiff, § § v. § § 1. Softlayer Technologies, Inc., § 2. CitiWare Technology Solutions, LLC, § 3. Google Inc., § 4. Yahoo! Inc., § 5. MySpace Inc., § 6. Amazon.com Inc., § 7. PayPal Inc., § 8. Match.com, Inc., § 9. AOL LLC, and § 10. CME Group Inc., § § Defendants. § Bedrock Computer Technologies LLC, Case No. 6:09-cv-269 Jury Trial Demanded (LED)
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO FILE PROPOSED DOCKET CONTROL AND DISCOVERY ORDERS Plaintiff, Bedrock Computer Technologies respectfully requests that the Court extend the deadline for the filing of proposed docket control and discovery orders from November 2, 2009 to November 5, 2009. Counsel for Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants have had on-going negotiations on the terms of the proposed orders and all parties are in agreement in the request for this extension.
Dated: November 2, 2009
Respectfully submitted, /s/ Robert Christopher Bunt Robert Christopher Bunt State Bar No. 00787165 Robert M. Parker State Bar No. 15498000 PARKER, BUNT & AINSWORTH, P.C. 100 E. Ferguson, Suite 1114 Tyler, Texas 75702 903/531-3535 903/533-9687 - Facsimile E-mail: email@example.com E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org Attorneys for Plaintiff Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the all counsel of record, who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served this November 2, 2009, with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). Any other counsel of record will be served by electronic mail, facsimile transmission and/or first class mail on this same date. /s/ Robert Christopher Bunt Robert Christopher Bunt
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.