Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 242

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 222 Motion to Amend/Correct Docket Control Order. DENIED as to the Softlayer Defendants. GRANTED as to the Red Hat Defendants. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 06/29/10. cc:attys 6-30-10 (mll, )

Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al Doc. 242 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC Plaintiff, vs. SOFTLAYER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al. Defendants. RED HAT, INC. Plaintiff, vs. BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES LLC Defendant. ORDER Defendants' Joint Motion to Amend Docket Control Orders (Docket No. 222, Civil Action No. 6:09cv269 ("Softlayer") and Docket No. 142, Civil Action No. 6:09cv549 ("Red Hat")) is before the Court. Having considered the parties' submissions, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' motion. As the Softlayer Defendants are in no way prejudiced by the deadlines under the current Docket Control Order (Docket No. 174, Softlayer), including the Markman hearing scheduled for October 7, 2010, the Court DENIES the motion as to the Softlayer Defendants. CASE NO. 609 CV 269 PATENT CASE CASE NO. 6:09-CV-549 PATENT CASE Dockets.Justia.com However, in light of Bedrock's Amended Answer and Third Party Complaint (Docket No. 30, Red Hat), filed on March 26, 2010 and asserting crossclaims against fourteen additional defendants, the Court GRANTS the motion as to the Red Hat Defendants. The Court hereby continues the Markman hearing in the Red Hat action to March 10, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. The Court ORDERS the parties in the Red Hat action to meet and confer and submit an agreed Amended Docket Control Order with a revised schedule of deadlines by July 6, 2010. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 29th day of June, 2010. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2