Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 867

ORDER denying 865 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; denying 866 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Motions are denied without prejudice if parties can agree on a schedule where all replies and surreplies are filed no later than 7-18-2011. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 07/07/11. cc:attys 7-07-11 (mll, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION BEDROCK COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff, vs. YAHOO! INC., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § Civil No. 6:09cv269 ORDER Before the Court are two Unopposed Motions for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (Doc. Nos. 865 & 866). Both motions concern replies to post-trial briefing and request an extension to file a reply through and including July 15, 2011. If the parties intend to submit surreplies, the proposed extended briefing schedule does not allow the Court sufficient time to prepare for the hearing scheduled on July 26, 2011. Consequently, the motions are DENIED without prejudice to refiling if the parties can agree on a schedule where all replies and surreplies are filed no later than July 18, 2011. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 7th day of July, 2011. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE