I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al
AGREED ORDER granting 879 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; ORDERED that Docket Items 871, 872 and 876 may exceed the page limit specified inLocal Rule 7(F)(3) as filed in their current form on January 25, 2013. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 1/29/13 and filed on 1/30/13. (jcow, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
JAM 3 0 2013
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
CLERK. US DjSTRICT COURT
I/P ENGINE, INC.,
Civ. Action No. 2:1 l-cv-512
AOL, INC. et al.
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ALLOW FILING OF
DOCKET ITEMS 871, 872 AND 876 WITH EXCESS PAGES
THIS MATTER COMES to the Court on plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion
to Allow Filing of Docket Items 871, 872 and 876 with Excess Pages. Upon consideration
thereof, and finding it to be in the interest of justice, it is hereby
ORDERED that Docket Items 871, 872 and 876 may exceed the page limit specified in
Local Rule 7(F)(3) as filed in their current form on January 25, 2013.
ENTERED thisg^day of VSl,i*uVSB No. 47423
CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN, P.L.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 1500
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 623-3000
Facsimile: (757) 623-5735
Jeffrey K. Sherwood, VSB No. 19222
Frank C. Cimino, Jr.
Kenneth W. Brothers
Dawn Rudenko Albert
Charles J. Monterio, Jr.
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1825 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: (202) 420-2200
Counselfor PlaintiffI/P Engine, Inc.
SEEN WITHOUT OBJECTION:
>bna, VSB No. 25367
& CANOLES, P.C.
150fWTfrti£in Street, Suite 2100
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Counselfor DefendantsAOL, Inc., Google, Inc.,
IACSearch & Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc.
and Target Corporation
(ViMiia BftWo. 25367)
kau™ak& CANOLES, P.C.
150/W. Marn Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510
Cortney S. Alexander
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3500 SunTrust Plaza
303 Peachtree Street, NE
Atlanta, GA 94111
Counselfor DefendantAOL, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.