I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 96

Declaration re 95 Reply to Response to Motion of Margaret Kammerud in Support of Google's Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Provide Conception, Reduction-to-Practice, and Priority Date Information for the Patents-in-Suit by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit L, # 2 Exhibit M, # 3 Exhibit N, # 4 Exhibit O, # 5 Exhibit P, # 6 Exhibit Q)(Noona, Stephen)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION I/P ENGINE, INC. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-512 V. AOL, INC., et al., Defendants. DECLARATION OF MARGARET KAMMERUD IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE CONCEPTION, REDUCTION-TO-PRACTICE, AND PRIORITY DATE INFORMATION FOR THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT I, Margaret P. Kammerud, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and am counsel for Defendant Google Inc. in the above-captioned case. I provide this declaration upon personal knowledge and, if called upon as a witness, would testify competently as to the matters recited herein. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of the document produced by Plaintiff under Bates range IPEL0001270-1273. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit M is a true and correct copy of the document produced by Plaintiff under Bates range IPEL0001395-1399. 01980.51928/4636514.1 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit N is a true and correct copy of the document produced by Plaintiff under Bates range IPEL0001557-1567. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 0 is a true and correct copy of an email from Plaintiff's counsel Charles Monterio to defense counsel, dated March 1, 2012. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit P is a true and correct copy of the document produced by Plaintiff's counsel on behalf of named inventor Andrew "Ken" Lang under Bates range LANG0007021-7028. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit Q is a true and correct copy of letter from Google's counsel David Perlson to Plaintiff's counsel Ken Brothers, dated January 5, 2012. 8. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: March 5, 2012 Margaret P. Kammerud 01980.51928/4636514.1 DATED: March 5, 2012 /s/ Stephen E. Noona Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624.3000 Facsimile: (757) 624.3169 senoona@kaufcan.com David Bilsker David A. Perlson QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 davidbilsker@quinnemanuel.com davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com Attorneys for Google Inc. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 5, 2012, I will electronically file the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notification of such filing (NEF) to the following: Jeffrey K. Sherwood Kenneth W. Brothers DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 1825 Eye Street NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 420-2200 Facsimile: (202) 420-2201 sherwoodj@dicksteinshapiro.com brothersk@dicksteinshapiro.com Donald C. Schultz W. Ryan Snow Steven Stancliff CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN, P.L.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 1500 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 623-3000 Facsimile: (757) 623-5735 dschultz@cwm-law.cm wrsnow@cwm-law.com sstancliff@cwm-law.com Counsel for Plaintiff, I/P Engine, Inc. Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624-3000 Facsimile: (757) 624-3169 senoona@kaufcan.com Counsel for Google Inc., Target Corporation, IAC Search & Media, Inc., and Gannet Co., Inc. 2 /s/ Stephen E. Noona Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624.3000 Facsimile: (757) 624.3169 senoona@kaufcan.com 11464104_1.DOC 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.