Interval Licensing LLC v. Yahoo! Inc.
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (Attachments: # 1 Claim Construction Order)(MD)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 INTERVAL LICENSING LLC, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, Case No. C13-266MJP Lead Case No. 2:10-cv-01385-MJP v. STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER YAHOO! INC., 14 Defendant. 15 16 Pursuant to this Court‟s February 14, 2013 Order (Dkt. # 1), Plaintiff Interval Licensing 17 18 19 LLC and Defendant Yahoo! Inc., have conferred and jointly file the attached proposed final judgment order. FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER 20 21 22 23 (1) Pursuant to Plaintiff‟s stipulation (Case No. 2:10-cv-01385-MJP, Dkt. No. 343-1) and the Court‟s attached claim construction order of December 28, 2012 (Case No. 2:10-cv01385-MJP, Dkt. No. 341), the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter final judgment of invalidity of 24 25 26 27 Claims 4-8, 11, 34, and 35 of U.S. Patent No. 6,034,652 (“the „652 Patent”) and Claims 1-4 and 7-15 of U.S. Patent No. 6,788,314 (“the „314 Patent”) and final judgment of non-infringement of Claims 15-18 of the „652 Patent. 28 (2) Pursuant to Defendant‟s stipulation (Case No. 2:10-cv-01385-MJP, Dkt. No. 343- 2), the Court ORDERS that Defendant‟s counterclaims with respect to the „652 Patent and the „314 Patent are DISMISSED without prejudice. Defendant shall have the right to assert any and all defenses and counterclaims to any claim for infringement of the „652 Patent or „314 Patent in this or any future case. (3) For the sake of clarity, this disposes of all claims in this action. As reflected at Dkt # 1, the Court severed the original action between the parties, Case No. 2:11-cv-00716-MJP (Lead Case No. 2:10-cv-01385-MJP), on February 12, 2013. It created this action, Case No. 2:13-cv-00266-MJP, and severed into it only those infringement claims and counterclaims related to the „652 Patent and „314 Patent. Though it directed Plaintiff to file its original complaint in this action, all claims and counterclaims arising from that complaint other than those related to the „652 Patent and „314 Patent remain a part of Case No. 2:11-cv-00716-MJP (Lead Case No. 2:10-cv-01385-MJP) and are not part of this case or the Final Judgment entered herein. The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel. Dated this 28th day of February, 2013. A Marsha J. Pechman United States District Judge