Carrigan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 13

ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court ORDERS plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why the court should not grant defendants' 9 motion to dismiss in its entirety for failure to oppose. Local Civ. R. 7(b)(2). Plaintiff shall respond within five days of this order. (CL)

Download PDF
1 HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 JAMES L. CARRIGAN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 14 ORDER v. 13 CASE NO. C13-276 RAJ WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al. Defendants. 15 16 17 This matter comes before the court sua sponte. On February 20, 2013, defendants 18 filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Dkt. # 9. The motion was noted for 19 consideration on March 22, 2013. To-date, plaintiff has not filed an opposition. The 20 court ORDERS plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE why the court should not grant defendants’ 21 motion to dismiss in its entirety for failure to oppose. Local Civ. R. 7(b)(2). Plaintiff 22 shall respond within five days of this order. 23 Dated this 8th day of May, 2013. 25 A 26 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 24 27 ORDER- 1