Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1-22

Filing 7

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND QUASHING SUBPOENAS by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (CL)

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 VOLTAGE PICTURES, LLC, 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, Case No. C13-0458RAJ-RSL v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND QUASHING SUBPOENAS DOES 1 - 22, Defendants. 13 14 15 This action was filed on March 13, 2013. It is one of forty-eight copyright 16 infringement actions filed during a four month period by attorney Richard J. Symmes 17 against approximately 2,323 individual Doe defendants. The twenty-two defendants in 18 this case are represented by IP addresses linked to on-line sharing of the movie 19 “Maximum Conviction” between 7:51 am on December 4, 2012, and 6:35 am on 20 February 23, 2013. Although the evidence of internet activity shows that hours, if not 21 days, separated each defendant’s allegedly infringing conduct, plaintiff alleges that all 22 twenty-two defendants participated in a single “swarm” utilizing interactive peer-to-peer 23 file transfer technology protocol called a BitTorrent to illegally copy and share 24 “Maximum Conviction.” Plaintiff affirmatively alleges that the “swarm” aspect of the 25 file-sharing justifies joinder of these disparate defendants in a single lawsuit. 26 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND QUASHING SUBPOENAS - 1 1 On March 27, 2013, the Court granted plaintiff’s motion to initiate early 2 discovery, including the issuance of subpoenas under Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 to internet 3 service providers, in an attempt to identify each Doe defendant. No defendants have filed 4 objections to the subpoenas. Despite the fact that more than six weeks have elapsed since 5 discovery was authorized, there is no indication that any defendants have been served, nor 6 has plaintiff amended its complaint to identify the Doe defendants. 7 All BitTorrent cases filed in the Western District of Washington have been 8 referred to the undersigned for pretrial handling. As the full extent of this assignment has 9 become clear, the Court admits to some concerns regarding both the appropriateness of 10 joinder and the possibility that the judicial authority of the United States may be used to 11 wrest improvident settlements from pro se litigants under threat of huge statutory 12 penalties. The Court is not alone: other judicial officers in the Ninth Circuit are beset by 13 the same concerns and have taken various paths to mitigate the potential for abuse. See, 14 e.g., Ingenuity 13 LLC v. John Doe, No. 2:12-cv-9333-ODW(JCx) (C.D. Cal. May 6, 15 2013); Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1-12, No. 2:13-292-AA (D. Or. May 4, 2013). 16 17 Having reviewed the record in this and related cases as well as the relevant case law, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 18 1. Any and all subpoenas issued in the above-captioned matter are hereby 19 QUASHED. Plaintiff shall immediately notify the subpoena recipients that they need not 20 respond. 21 2. To the extent plaintiff has obtained identifying information regarding one or 22 more Doe defendants, whether through the service provider, defendant, or another source, 23 it shall not utilize that information in any way. If plaintiff has already contacted one or 24 more of the defendants, it shall file under seal all correspondence or other written 25 communications (including emails) sent to defendants and a summary of any oral 26 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND QUASHING SUBPOENAS - 2 1 communications. Plaintiff shall refrain from any further oral or written communications 2 with defendants unless expressly approved by the Court in advance. 3 3. Plaintiff shall, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, show cause why 4 the above-captioned matter should not be dismissed as to all defendants other than Doe 1 5 for improper joinder and/or pursuant to the Court’s inherent authority to control its 6 docket. 7 4. Plaintiff shall, within fourteen days of the date of this Order, provide additional 8 information regarding Voltage Pictures, LLC’s ownership of the copyright at issue, 9 including a copy of any and all transfer statements and/or work-for-hire agreements 10 supporting a determination that Voltage Pictures, LLC has standing to pursue this action. 11 See Righthaven LLC v. Hoehn, No. 11-16751, 2013 WL 1908876 (9th Cir. May 9, 2013). 12 13 5. With the exception of the actions specifically set forth in this Order, the abovecaptioned matter is hereby STAYED. 14 15 16 The Clerk of Court is directed to place this Order to Show Cause on the Court’s calendar for Friday, May 24, 2013. 17 18 DATED this 10th day of May, 2013. 19 20 21 A 22 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND QUASHING SUBPOENAS - 3