Triumph Sports USA INC v. Escalade Sports
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 6/11/2013.(cc: all counsel)(llc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
TRIUMPH SPORTS USA, INC.,
Case No. 13-CV-53
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
The above-entitled action was filed on January 15, 2013. By order dated May 16, 2013, this
court advised the plaintiff that court records indicated that it had not effected service upon the
defendant and that the case appeared to be subject to dismissal, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 4(m) and Civil Local Rule 41(a) (E.D. Wis.). As a result, the plaintiff was ordered to show
cause within twenty-one days as to why it had not effected service of process within the time required
by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) requires service of the summons and complaint within 120 days after the
filing of the complaint. Civil Local Rule 41(a) provides:
Where the plaintiff has not effected service of process within the time required by Fed.
R. Civ. P. 4(m), and the defendant has not waived service under Rule 4(d), after 21
days’ notice to the attorney of record for the plaintiff, or the plaintiff if pro se, the Court
may enter an order dismissing the action without prejudice.
By order dated May 16, 2013, the plaintiff was put on notice that unless service of process was
effected upon the defendant within twenty-one days after receipt of that order, an order would be
entered dismissing this action, without prejudice. A review of the records reveals that service of
process has not been effected on the defendant and the time for effecting service under Rule 4(m) has
expired. Therefore, this action will be dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Civil Local Rule
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that this action be and hereby is DISMISSED
without prejudice, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 41(a).
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 11th day of June, 2013.
BY THE COURT
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.