Seventh Circuit Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 24,527
Pratt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv03125
Plaintiff:
Tonya S Pratt
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
JONES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
KRISTIAN JONES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pisarski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Michelle L Pisarski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Schaefer v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04030
Plaintiff:
Josette Schaefer
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Trotter v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04025
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Trotter
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ringler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Joshua J Ringler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
WISE v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY N. WISE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Joseph v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03963
Plaintiff:
Augustine Joseph
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Graminski v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv01277
Plaintiff:
David Graminski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bonner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03960
Plaintiff:
Vernon Bonner
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
