Eighth Circuit Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 349,653
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Moore et al v. AMG Logistics, INC et al
as 2:2024cv04078
Plaintiff:
Harold Moore and Linda Nichols
Defendant:
AMG Logistics, INC and Duc Duong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bradley v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Trey Tarell Bradley
Defendant:
Mike Parson, Andrew Bailey, Brent Teichman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schurman v. Luke
as 4:2024cv04100
Petitioner:
Stephanie Amanda Schurman
Respondent:
Steven Luke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Castner v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 8:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Clarence Lloyd Castner
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cornelius v. Avis Budget Car Rental LLC
as 4:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Ronisha Cornelius
Defendant:
Avis Budget Car Rental LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fly v. Woodcock et al
as 6:2024cv03151
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Fly
Defendant:
Deputy Jacob Woodcock and Christian County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Hartmann et al
as 4:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Clark
Defendant:
Klaus Hartmann, Brittani E. Lewit, Kristi Egger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Barber et al
as 4:2024cv03093
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Clark
Defendant:
David Barber, John A. Vik, Kingswood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
