Florida Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19,623
SHIELDS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
TINA SHIELDS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Embry, Jr. v. O'Malley
as 9:2024cv80634
Plaintiff:
Walter Embry, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carlos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2024cv60840
Plaintiff:
Fidel Velez Carlos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Velez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2024cv60841
Plaintiff:
Carlos Fidel Velez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Turner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv01211
Plaintiff:
Brittney Turner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Quesada v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv21908
Plaintiff:
Milagros Quesada
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kennen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Albert Joseph Kennen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mesoraca v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv14151
Plaintiff:
Roxane Mesoraca
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fernandez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv21877
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Fernandez
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Portales v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv21893
Plaintiff:
Ms Yanet Portales
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
