US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky
Cases 1 - 10 of 28,139
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Jones v. Cardwell et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Treyshawn L. Jones
Defendant:
Andre Cardwell, Bradley Hansford, D. Puckett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skees v. Peoples Bank
as 3:2024cv00292
Defendant:
Peoples Bank and Limestone Bank, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Timothy Skees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Thompson v. Geddie
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Nikole Thompson
Defendant:
Karen Geddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 mv Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00291
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Swift Roofing Inc. v. GL Housing Construction LLC
as 5:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Swift Roofing Inc.
Respondent:
GL Housing Construction LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Ashby v. Burgess
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Ashby
Defendant:
Meredith G. Burgess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv Removal- Motor Vehicle
Mathews v. Guinn et al
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Melvin Deandre Mathews
Defendant:
Sherri Guinn, Christian County Jail and Kenton County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bratcher v. Unum Provident Insurance Co.
as 3:2024cv00290
Defendant:
Unum Provident Insurance Co. and Unum Appeals Unit
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bratcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eb Removal - E.R.I.S.A. Employee Benefits
Vowels v. USPS OIG et al
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Lesley Vowels
Defendant:
USPS OIG, The State of Kentucky: Kentucky Secretary of State, KY Western District and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
