Missouri Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20,733
Bradley v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Trey Tarell Bradley
Defendant:
Mike Parson, Andrew Bailey, Brent Teichman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Missouri Eastern Correctional Center et al
as 4:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
Marcus Sanders
Defendant:
Missouri Eastern Correctional Center, Sgt. Unknown Herron, Sgt. Unknown Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spann v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Jihad Ahmad Spann
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zuko v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Sokol Zuko
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bynum v. Woods
as 4:2024cv00688
Petitioner:
Darryl R. Bynum
Respondent:
Ryan Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haral v. Greene County Jail et al
as 6:2024cv03145
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Haral
Defendant:
Greene County Jail and Dr McGreevy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monderen v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonia Young-Griffin, Timothy Seabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Keete Group
as 4:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
David Lettieri
Defendant:
Keete Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sesson v. Ruhman et al
as 4:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Johnny Bruce Sesson, III
Defendant:
Det. Crystal Ruhman, Det. Matthew Geisman and Det. Joseph Percich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
