District Court Cases in Oklahoma
Cases 11 - 20 of 53,055
Russell v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Ryan Russell
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Chris Thomas, Craig E. Boelte and others
Capps v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Carl Joseph Capps
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Karty v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Jamee Shae Karty
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Trupia v. Heritage Hard Assets LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Anthony Trupia
Defendant:
Heritage Hard Assets LLC, Kyle Patton, HLV Ventures and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Whitecap Natural Gas Services LLC v. Coxcom LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Whitecap Natural Gas Services LLC
Defendant:
Coxcom LLC and Cox Oklahoma Telecom LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Johnson et al v. The University of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Brayden Johnson, Logan Rhines and Kayla Savage
Defendant:
The University of Oklahoma, Joseph Harroz, Jr., Jeff Blahnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Kemmerlin v. Lipstick Cabaret, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Samantha Kemmerlin
Defendant:
Lipstick Cabaret, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bowden v. USVA Hospital JC Montgomery Muskogee
as 4:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Carmen Bowden
Defendant:
USVA Hospital JC Montgomery Muskogee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sumpter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
James L Sumpter, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
