US v. Bennett

Filing 920061121

Opinion

var gAgent = navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase()
var gWindows = ( (gAgent.indexOf( "win" ) != -1 ) || ( gAgent.indexOf( "16bit" ) != -1 ) )
var gIE = ( gAgent.indexOf( "msie" ) != -1 )
var bInlineFloats = ( gWindows && gIE && ( parseInt( navigator.appVersion ) >= 4 ) )
var floatwnd = 0

var WPFootnote1 = 'Absent the USPO\'s determination that Bennett was an armed career\
criminal, Bennett would have been subject to an advisory guideline\
range of 24-30 months.\
'

var WPFootnote2 = 'There is some question as to whether Bennett preserved this\
argument for appeal. He certainly did not develop the argument\
very well, focusing instead on whether his conviction satisfied the\
"otherwise" clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii), but we will\
assume for purposes of this decision that he did preserve the\
argument below.\
'

var WPFootnote3 = 'In examining the record, a court is "limited to the terms of the\
charging document, the terms of a plea agreement or transcript of\
colloquy between judge and defendant in which the factual basis for\
the plea was confirmed by the defendant, or to some comparable\
judicial record of this information." Shepard v. United States,\
544 U.S. 13, 26 (2005).\
'

function WPShow( WPid, WPtext )
{
if( bInlineFloats )
eval( "document.all." + WPid + ".style.visibility = 'visible'" );
else
{
if( floatwnd == 0 || floatwnd.closed )
floatwnd = window.open( "", "comment", "toolbars=0,width=600,height=200,resizable=1,scrollbars=1,dependent=1" );
floatwnd.document.open( "text/html", "replace" );
floatwnd.document.write( "\r\n" );
floatwnd.document.write( " p { margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1px; } \r\n" );
floatwnd.document.write( "\r\n" );
floatwnd.document.write( WPtext );
floatwnd.document.write( 'Close');
floatwnd.document.write( "