Walden, et al v. Lennon, et al

Filing 920100514

Opinion

Download PDF
p { margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 1px } hr { height: 0.0125in; background-color: black } body { font-family: "Courier New", monospace; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal } United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 08-1534 THOMAS WALDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. CITY OF PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND, by and through its Treasurer, STEPHEN NAPOLITANO; DAVID CICILLINE, in his official capacity as Mayor and Acting Public Safety Commissioner for the City of Providence; COLONEL DEAN ESSERMAN, in his official capacity as the Chief of Police for the City of Providence, Defendants, Appellants, Cross-Appellees. No. 08-1535 THOMAS WALDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. MARY LENNON, individually and in her former official capacity as the Chief of Operations of the Communications Department, Defendant, Appellant, Cross-Appellee. No. 08-1536 THOMAS WALDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. MANUEL VIEIRA, individually and in his former official capacity as the Communications Director, Defendant, Appellant, Cross-Appellee. No. 08-2417 THOMAS WALDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. CITY OF PROVIDENCE, et al., Defendants, Appellants, Cross-Appellees. ERRATA SHEET     The opinion of this Court, issued on February 23, 2010, is amended as follows:     On page 29, at the beginning of line 1, the following language should be inserted: In addition to there being no clear notice from the Supreme Court opinions, we have found no cases in this circuit or elsewhere sufficiently similar to have alerted the defendants to the illegality of their conduct. See Anderson, 483 U.S. at 640 (noting that "in the light of pre-existing law the unlawfulness must be apparent").     On page 29, at line 1, "No First Circuit case had clearly established" should be substituted for "Nor had any First Circuit case held".

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?