Dong v. Holder

Filing 920091106

Opinion

var gAgent = navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase()
var gWindows = ( (gAgent.indexOf( "win" ) != -1 ) || ( gAgent.indexOf( "16bit" ) != -1 ) )
var gIE = ( gAgent.indexOf( "msie" ) != -1 )
var bInlineFloats = ( gWindows && gIE && ( parseInt( navigator.appVersion ) >= 4 ) )
var floatwnd = 0

var WPFootnote1 = 'Of the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.\
'

var WPFootnote2 = ' Two other circuits reached the same conclusion in subsequent\
cases. See Yu v. U.S. Att\'y Gen., 568 F.3d 1328, 1332-33 (11th\
Cir. 2009) (per curiam); Lin-Zheng v. Att\'y Gen., 557 F.3d 147, 149\
(3d Cir. 2009) (en banc).\
'

var WPFootnote3 = ' Dong\'s brief is not a model of clarity with respect to the\
relief requested. For the sake of thoroughness, we consider all of\
the possibilities suggested by his filings.\
'

var WPFootnote4 = ' Dong apparently meant to invoke the Lin court\'s observation\
that the spouse of an individual who has been subjected to coercive\
population control measures, although not automatically eligible\
for asylum, might nevertheless be eligible under section 601(a)\'s\
"other resistance" provision. See Lin, 494 F.3d at 313.\
'

function WPShow( WPid, WPtext )
{
if( bInlineFloats )
eval( "document.all." + WPid + ".style.visibility = 'visible'" );
else
{
if( floatwnd == 0 || floatwnd.closed )
floatwnd = window.open( "", "comment", "toolbars=0,width=600,height=200,resizable=1,scrollbars=1,dependent=1" );
floatwnd.document.open( "text/html", "replace" );
floatwnd.document.write( "\r\n" );
floatwnd.document.write( " p { margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1px; } \r\n" );
floatwnd.document.write( "\r\n" );
floatwnd.document.write( WPtext );
floatwnd.document.write( 'Close');
floatwnd.document.write( "