US v. DePierre

Filing 920100315

Opinion

Download PDF
var gAgent = navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase() var gWindows = ( (gAgent.indexOf( "win" ) != -1 ) || ( gAgent.indexOf( "16bit" ) != -1 ) ) var gIE = ( gAgent.indexOf( "msie" ) != -1 ) var bInlineFloats = ( gWindows && gIE && ( parseInt( navigator.appVersion ) >= 4 ) ) var floatwnd = 0 var WPFootnote1 = 'See generally Office of National Drug Control Policy, Street\ Terms: Drugs and the Drug Trade, Crack Cocaine,\ http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/streetterms/ByType.asp?intTypeID=2 (last visited February 25, 2010) (listing "cookies" as a\ slang term for crack cocaine).\ ' var WPFootnote2 = 'Adding to confusion, this circuit uses the phrases\ "sentencing factor manipulation" and "sentencing entrapment"\ interchangeably, United States v. Jaca-Nazario, 521 F.3d 50, 57\ (1st Cir. 2008), but other circuits vary, e.g., United States v.\ Garcia, 79 F.3d 74, 75 (7th Cir. 1996) (distinguishing between\ government inducement of a more serious crime and conduct merely\ increasing the defendant\'s sentence); United States v. Jones, 18\ F.3d 1145, 1152-53 (4th Cir. 1994) (sentencing entrapment\ implicates defendant\'s predisposition but manipulation does not).\ ' var WPFootnote3 = 'Circuits limiting "cocaine base" to only crack (or to crack\ and other types of smokable cocaine base) include United States v.\ Higgins, 557 F.3d 381, 394-96 (6th Cir. 2009); United States v.\ Edwards, 397 F.3d 570, 575-77 (7th Cir. 2005); United States v.\ Vesey, 330 F.3d 1070, 1073 (8th Cir. 2003); United States v.\ Hollis, 490 F.3d 1149, 1155-57 (9th Cir. 2007); United States v.\ Munoz-Realpe, 21 F.3d 375, 377-78 (11th Cir. 1994); and United\ States v. Brisbane, 367 F.3d 910, 912-14 (D.C. Cir. 2004).\ ' var WPFootnote4 = 'In this circuit, see United States v. Medina, 427 F.3d 88, 92\ (1st Cir. 2005); United States v. Richardson, 225 F.3d 46, 49 (1st\ Cir. 2000); and United States v. Lopez-Gil, 965 F.2d 1124, 1134-35\ (1st Cir. 1992) (opinion on rehearing). For other circuits of the\ same view, see United States v. Jackson, 968 F.2d 158, 162-63 (2d\ Cir. 1992); United States v. Barbosa, 271 F.3d 438, 466-67 (3d Cir.\ 2001); United States v. Ramos, 462 F.3d 329, 333-34 (4th Cir.\ 2006); United States v. Butler, 988 F.2d 537, 542-43 (5th Cir.\ 1993); and United States v. Easter, 981 F.2d 1549, 1558 & n.7 (10th\ Cir. 1992). \ ' function WPShow( WPid, WPtext ) { if( bInlineFloats ) eval( "document.all." + WPid + ".style.visibility = 'visible'" ); else { if( floatwnd == 0 || floatwnd.closed ) floatwnd = window.open( "", "comment", "toolbars=0,width=600,height=200,resizable=1,scrollbars=1,dependent=1" ); floatwnd.document.open( "text/html", "replace" ); floatwnd.document.write( "\r\n" ); floatwnd.document.write( " p { margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1px; } \r\n" ); floatwnd.document.write( "\r\n" ); floatwnd.document.write( WPtext ); floatwnd.document.write( 'Close'); floatwnd.document.write( "

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?