Parsley v. US

Filing 920100517

Opinion

Download PDF
var gAgent = navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase() var gWindows = ( (gAgent.indexOf( "win" ) != -1 ) || ( gAgent.indexOf( "16bit" ) != -1 ) ) var gIE = ( gAgent.indexOf( "msie" ) != -1 ) var bInlineFloats = ( gWindows && gIE && ( parseInt( navigator.appVersion ) >= 4 ) ) var floatwnd = 0 var WPFootnote1 = '                   The government tells us in a footnote that Parsley\'s\ sentence ended up more or less where it would have been if Parsley\ had pled guilty to 750 kilograms but then received the two level\ reduction for acceptance of responsibility. The government uses\ this to argue that Parsley suffered no prejudice in any event.\ ' var WPFootnote2 = '                   This court granted a certificate of appealability in July\ 2009.\ ' var WPFootnote3 = '                   Parsley states that he does not contest the district\ court\'s finding of facts as clearly erroneous. To the extent\ Parsley disputes the district court\'s finding that Parsley knew at\ the time that he could have entered an open plea and contested the\ drug quantity at sentencing, we conclude that the factual finding\ was not clear error. There was ample evidence presented at the\ evidentiary hearing that both trial counsel and the federal\ prosecutor discussed this option with Parsley.\ ' function WPShow( WPid, WPtext ) { if( bInlineFloats ) eval( "document.all." + WPid + ".style.visibility = 'visible'" ); else { if( floatwnd == 0 || floatwnd.closed ) floatwnd = window.open( "", "comment", "toolbars=0,width=600,height=200,resizable=1,scrollbars=1,dependent=1" ); floatwnd.document.open( "text/html", "replace" ); floatwnd.document.write( "\r\n" ); floatwnd.document.write( " p { margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1px; } \r\n" ); floatwnd.document.write( "\r\n" ); floatwnd.document.write( WPtext ); floatwnd.document.write( 'Close'); floatwnd.document.write( "

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?