Igartua, et al v. US, et al

Filing 920110218

Opinion

var gAgent = navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase()
var gWindows = ( (gAgent.indexOf( "win" ) != -1 ) || ( gAgent.indexOf( "16bit" ) != -1 ) )
var gIE = ( gAgent.indexOf( "msie" ) != -1 )
var bInlineFloats = ( gWindows && gIE && ( parseInt( navigator.appVersion ) >= 4 ) )
var floatwnd = 0

var WPFootnote1 = '                                                The Commonwealth\'s attempted reliance on related litigations involving plaintiff\
Igartúa is unavailing. As the Commonwealth notes, it was allowed to intervene in Igartua de la Rosa\
v. United States, 229 F.3d 80, 82-83 (1st Cir. 2000). Not only was that intervention unopposed,\
however, it was granted by the district court, not a panel of this court. In the most recent round of\
litigation prior to this one, the Commonwealth participated as an amicus. See Igartúa-de la Rosa v.\
United States, 417 F.3d 145 (1st Cir. 2005) (en banc).\
'

function WPShow( WPid, WPtext )
{
if( bInlineFloats )
eval( "document.all." + WPid + ".style.visibility = 'visible'" );
else
{
if( floatwnd == 0 || floatwnd.closed )
floatwnd = window.open( "", "comment", "toolbars=0,width=600,height=200,resizable=1,scrollbars=1,dependent=1" );
floatwnd.document.open( "text/html", "replace" );
floatwnd.document.write( "\r\n" );
floatwnd.document.write( " p { margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:1px; } \r\n" );
floatwnd.document.write( "\r\n" );
floatwnd.document.write( WPtext );
floatwnd.document.write( 'Close');
floatwnd.document.write( "