Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al v. Tenenbaum

Filing 11

ORDER consolidating cases for purposes of briefing and oral argument. The following case(s) are consolidated: 10-2052 (Consolidated started 09/17/2010) with 10-1883; extending time to file brief and appendix. Brief due 10/27/2010 for Appellant/Cross-Appellee Arista Records, LLC, Appellant/Cross-Appellee Atlantic Recording Corporation, Appellant/Cross-Appellee Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Appellant/Cross-Appellee UMG Recordings Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee Warner Bros Records Inc and Appellant/Cross-Appellee United States. Appendix due 10/27/2010 for Appellant/Cross-Appellee Arista Records, LLC, Appellant/Cross-Appellee Atlantic Recording Corporation, Appellant/Cross-Appellee Sony BMG Music Entertainment, Appellant/Cross-Appellee UMG Recordings Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee Warner Bros Records Inc and Appellant/Cross-Appellee United States. [10-1883, 10-1947, 10-2052] (AS)

Download PDF
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al v. Tenenbaum Doc. 11 United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________________ Nos. 10-1883; 10-1947; 10-2052 SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership; WARNER BROS RECORDS INC, a Delaware Corporation; ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; ARISTA RECORDS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; UMG RECORDINGS INC., a Delaware corporation; UNITED STATES, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. JOEL TENENBAUM, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant. ____________________________ ORDER OF COURT Entered: September 17, 2010 Pursuant to 1st Cir. R. 27.0(d) Appeal Nos. 10-1883 and 10-2052 are consolidated for purposes of briefing and oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(b)(2). Appeal No. 10-1947 is a cross-appeal to the consolidated cases. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28.1, it is hereby ordered that the above-named plaintiffs be deemed the appellants/cross-appellees ("appellants") and that defendant Joel Tenenbaum be deemed the appellee/cross-appellant ("appellee"). The parties are directed to use the above caption on all future filings related to these cases. The briefing schedule previously set in Appeal Nos. 10-1883 and 10-1947 on August 31, 2010 is hereby vacated. The following is the new briefing schedule for these appeals: First Brief: Appellants' principal brief and appendix are due on or before October 27, 2010. Second Brief: Appellee's principal/response brief must be filed within 30 days of service of the first brief; Third Brief: Appellants' response/reply must be filed within 30 days of service of the second brief; and Dockets.Justia.com Fourth Brief: Appellee's reply brief must be filed within 14 days of service of the third brief. Any party wishing to object to any part of this order must file a written objection by no later than October 1, 2010. By the Court: /s/ Margaret Carter, Clerk cc: Charles Nesson Daniel Cloherty Diane Cabell Eve Burton John Palfrey Mark Walsh Mary Thomas Sullivan Matthew Oppenheim Matthew Kamholtz Matthew Feinberg Michelle Bennett Theodore Griswold Fletcher Timothy Reynolds Victoria Steinberg CROSS APPEALS FED. R. APP. P. 28.1 INFORMATION SHEET BRIEF BRIEF COVER Fed. R. App. P. 28.1 Blue LENGTH LIMIT Fed. R. App. P. 28.1(e) 30 PAGES or 14,000 WORDS/ 1,300 LINES (monospaced text only) 35 PAGES or 16,500 WORDS/ 1,500 LINES (monospaced text only) DUE DATE Fed. R. App. P. 28.1(f) 40 days after record is complete or date set by Clerk's Office 30 days later First Brief Appellants/Cross-Appellees' PRINCIPAL BRIEF Second Brief Appellee/Cross-Appellant's PRINCIPAL/RESPONSE BRIEF Red Third Briefs Appellants/Cross-Appellees' RESPONSE/REPLY BRIEF Yellow 30 PAGES or 14,000 WORDS/ 1,300 LINES (monospaced text only) 30 days later Fourth Brief Appellee/Cross-Appellant's REPLY BRIEF Grey 15 PAGES or 7,000 WORDS/ 650 LINES (monospaced text only) 14 days later

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?