Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al v. Tenenbaum

Filing 62

ORDER entered by Sandra L. Lynch, Chief Appellate Judge denying motion for oral argument filed by Amicus Curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation in 10-1883, 10-1947, 10-2052, denying motion for oral argument filed by intervenor US in 10-1883, 10-1947, 10-2052. [10-1883, 10-1947, 10-2052] (AS)

Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al v. Tenenbaum

Doc. 62

United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
Nos. 10-1883, 10-1947, 10-2052 SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, a Delaware general partnership, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, _________________________ ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. JOEL TENENBAUM, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

ORDER OF COURT Entered: March 21, 2011 In these consolidated appeals, the intervenor United States has moved for fifteen minutes of independent oral argument. Amicus Electronic Frontier Foundation ("EFF") has filed a similar motion on its own behalf. After review, both motions are denied. Argument in these appeals is set as follows: The intervenor United States is allotted ten minutes of oral argument time and the other plaintiffs-appellants/cross-appellees will have ten minutes of oral argument time. Defendantappellee/cross-appellant Tenenbaum is assigned twenty minutes of oral argument time. He and EFF may confer and report back to this court on or before March 25 whether they will agree to divide that time and, if so, what division of time they propose. So ordered. By the Court: /s/ Margaret Carter, Clerk.

cc: Charles Nesson, Daniel Cloherty, Diane Cabell, Eve Burton, John Palfrey, Mark Walsh, Mary Thomas Sullivan, Matthew Oppenheim, Matthew Kamholtz, Matthew Feinberg, Michelle Bennett, Theodore Griswold Fletcher, Timothy Reynolds, Victoria Steinberg, Michael Barclay, Jason Harrow

Dockets.Justia.com