Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al v. Tenenbaum

Filing 63

LETTER regarding Division of Argument Time filed by Attorney Charles R. Nesson for Appellee/Cross-Appellant Joel Tenenbaum in 10-1883, 10-1947, 10-2052. Certificate of service dated 03/25/2011. [10-1883, 10-1947, 10-2052] (CRN)

Sony BMG Music Entertainment, et al v. Tenenbaum

Doc. 63

Charles R. Nesson 1525 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge, MA 02138 [phone] March 25, 2011 Ms. Margaret Carter Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 1 Courthouse Way, Suite 2500 Boston, MA 02210 Re: Sony BMG v. Tenenbaum, Nos. 10­1883, 10-1947, 10-2052 Dear Ms. Carter: I represent Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant Joel Tenenbaum in this matter. I write in response to the Court's order of March 21 regarding oral argument. I have conferred with amicus Electronic Frontier Foundation, and we have agreed to divide argument time. The proposal is as follows: 16 minutes total for Defendant-Appellee Joel Tenenbaum (to be divided among two attorneys who have submitted designation forms), and 4 minutes total for amicus Electronic Frontier Foundation. We further propose that the Electronic Frontier Foundation be able to present its argument at the beginning of the allotted time, followed by the presentation by counsel for Tenenbaum. Counsel presenting oral argument for amicus have assured me that they will promptly file a designation form. Thank you for consideration in this matter. Sincerely, /s/ CHARLES R. NESSON 1525 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 [phone] cc: Opposing counsel and amicus (via ECF)

Dockets.Justia.com