Deka International S.A. Luxemb, et al v. Genzyme Corporation, et al
Filing
ERRATA to opinion (published) [5828702-2] filed. [13-1085]
Case: 13-1085
Document: 00116697733
Page: 1
Date Filed: 06/06/2014
Entry ID: 5829050
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 13-1085
IN RE: GENZYME CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION,
DEKA INTERNATIONAL S.A. LUXEMBOURG; CITY OF EDINBURGH
COUNCIL AS ADMINISTERING AUTHORITY OF THE LOTHIAN PENSION
FUND; GOVERNMENT OF GUAM RETIREMENT FUND,
Plaintiffs, Appellants,
VIVIAN OH, individually and on behalf of all other
similarly situated; JON RAHN, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated;
GENZYME INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS,
Plaintiffs,
v.
GENZYME CORPORATION; HENRI A. TERMEER; DAVID P. MEEKER;
MICHAEL S. WYZGA; ALLISON LAWTON; MARK R. BAMFORTH;
GEOFFREY MCDONOUGH,
Defendants, Appellees.
ERRATA SHEET
The opinion of this Court issued on June 5, 2014, is amended
as follows:
On page 20, line 20: replace "defendants's
misleading" with "defendants' allegedly misleading"
allegedly
On page 23, line 10: replace "defendants earlier positive"
with "defendants' earlier positive"
On page 23, line 16: replace "plaintiffs'
preferred" with "plaintiffs would have preferred"
would
have
Case: 13-1085
Document: 00116697733
Page: 2
Date Filed: 06/06/2014
Entry ID: 5829050
On page 25, line 16: replace "Geel and Allston facility" with
"Geel and Allston facilities"
On page 29, line 13: replace "Plaintiffs' also assert" with
"Plaintiffs also assert"
On page 33, line 15: replace "post judgment" with "postjudgment"
On page 36, line 18: replace "abuse it's discretion" with
"abuse its discretion"
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?