Lopez, et al v. City of Lawrence, Massachusett, et al

Filing

ERRATA issued by court to opinion (published) [6000644-2]. [14-1952]

Download PDF
Case: 14-1952 Document: 00117006370 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/27/2016 Entry ID: 6003989 United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 14-1952 PEDRO LOPEZ, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; ABEL CANO, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; KEVIN SLEDGE, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; CHARLES DE JESÚS, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; RICHARD BROOKS, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; MASSACHUSETTS HISPANIC LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; ROBERT ALVAREZ, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; SPENCER TATUM, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; SHUMEAND BENFOLD, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; ANGELA WILLIAMS-MITCHELL, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; GWENDOLYN BROWN, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; LYNETTE PRAILEAU, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; TYRONE SMITH, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; EDDY CHRISPIN, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; DAVID E. MELVIN, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; STEVEN MORGAN, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; WILLIAM E. IRAOLO, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; JOSÉ LOZANO, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; COURTNEY A. POWELL, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; JAMES L. BROWN, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; GEORGE CARDOZA, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; LARRY ELLISON, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; DAVID SINGLETARY, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; CHARISSE BRITTLE POWELL, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; CATHENIA D. COOPER-PATERSON, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; MOLWYN SHAW, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; LAMONT ANDERSON, individually Case: 14-1952 Document: 00117006370 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/27/2016 Entry ID: 6003989 and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; GLORIA KINKEAD, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; KENNETH GAINES, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; MURPHY GREGORY, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; JULIAN TURNER, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; NEVA GRICE, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; DELORES E. FACEY, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; LISA VENUS, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; RODNEY O. BEST, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; KAREN VANDYKE, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; ROBERT C. YOUNG, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; ROYLINE LAMB, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; LYNN DAVIS, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; JAMES A. JACKSON, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; JUAN ROSARIO, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; LOUIS ROSARIO, JR., individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; OBED ALMEYDA, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; DEVON WILLIAMS, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated; JULIO M. TOLEDO, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Appellants, MARISOL NOBREGA, individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LAWRENCE, MASSACHUSETTS; CITY OF METHUEN, MASSACHUSETTS; JOHN MICHAEL SULLIVAN, in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Lawrence, Massachusetts; WILLIAM MANZI, III, in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Methuen, Massachusetts; CITY OF LOWELL, MASSACHUSETTS; CITY OF WORCESTER, MASSACHUSETTS; APPOINTING AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY OF LOWELL, MASSACHUSETTS; MICHAEL O’BRIEN, in his capacity as City Manager of the City of Worcester, Massachusetts; CITY OF BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS; CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS; DOMENIC J. SARNO, JR., in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Springfield, Massachusetts; Case: 14-1952 Document: 00117006370 Page: 3 Date Filed: 05/27/2016 Entry ID: 6003989 MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; DANIEL GRABAUSKAS, in his capacity as General Manager, Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Defendants, Appellees, WILLIAM F. MARTIN, in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Lowell, Massachusetts; KONSTANTINA B. LUKES, in her capacity as Mayor of the City of Worcester, Massachusetts; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; PAUL DIETL, in his capacity as Personnel Administrator for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendants. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on May 18, 2016, is amended as follows: On page 4, lines 40-41, insert "Massachusetts Association," between "Massachusetts Municipal Association," and "National Public Employer Labor Association". Municipal Lawyers Relations

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?