United States v. Andrade-Lopez
FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit
December 9, 2008
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NOE ANDRADE-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 08-4136 (D.C. No. 2:06-cr-00852-TS-1) (D. Utah)
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before HARTZ, TYMKOVICH and GORSUCH, Circuit Judges.
This matter is before the court on the government's motion to enforce the appeal waiver contained in defendant Noe Andrade-Lopez's plea agreement. The motion was filed pursuant to United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). Defendant, through counsel, filed a response to the motion to enforce conceding that there are no meritorious grounds upon which he
This panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
can urge denial of the government's motion to enforce the appeal waiver. Based on our review of the record, we are satisfied that the appeal is within the scope of the appeal waiver, that the waiver was knowing and voluntary, and that enforcing the waiver would not result in any miscarriage of justice. Accordingly, the government's motion is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT PER CURIAM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?