Doe v. City of Albuquerque
Filing
12
[9763223] Case referred for mediation conferencing. Please open the document link in this notice for additional information.
Doe v. City of Albuquerque
CIRCUIT MEDIATION OFFICE
Doc. 12
U N I T E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS
F O R THE TENTH CIRCUIT
B Y R O N WHITE UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 1 8 2 3 STOUT STREET D E N V E R , COLORADO 80257 DAVID W. AEMMER
CHIEF CIRCUIT MEDIATOR
T E L E P H O N E 303 844-6017 FACSIMILE 303 844-6437
LANCE OLWELL KYLE ANN SCHULTZ
CIRCUIT MEDIATORS
May 17, 2010 John C. Bienvenu, Esq. Brendan K. Egan, Esq. Richard W. Hughes, Esq. Rothstein, Donatelli, Hughes, Dahlstrom, Schoenburg & Bienvenu, LLP P.O. Box 8180 Santa Fe, NM 87504 Gregory S. Wheeler, Esq. Peter H. Pierotti, Esq. Office of the City Attorney P.O. Box 2248 Albuquerque, NM 87103
RE: No. 10-2102 John Doe v. City of Albuquerque MEDIATION CONFERENCE NOTICE Dear Counsel: Pursuant to Rule 33.1, Rules of the Tenth Circuit, a mediation conference has been scheduled in this case. This office will initiate a TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL on Wednesday, June 2, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. MOUNTAIN DAYLIGHT TIME. Please allow at least two hours for the conference. The purposes of the conference are to explore any possibilities for settlement and to resolve procedural problems. Counsel are expected to have consulted with their clients prior to the conference and to have as much authority as feasible regarding settlement and case management matters. Counsel addressed above are understood to be the lawyers with primary responsibility for this case. Please contact this office BY TELEPHONE IMMEDIATELY if we need to notify different or additional lawyers or if you need to have the conference rescheduled because of an unavoidable conflict. Participation in the conference by cell phone is not permitted. Sincerely,
Rose Giacinti Conference Administrator
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?