Doe v. City of Albuquerque

Filing 46

[9912121] Order filed by Judges Briscoe, Ebel, and O'Brien Simultaneous Supplemental briefs due before the close of business on Tuesday, 11/29/2011 for Appellant City of Albuquerque, and Appellee John Doe addressing the Administrative Instruction of the City of Abluquerque. ( Please see attached order for further instructions regarding supplemental briefs). Served on 10/20/2011. [Entered: 10/20/2011 11:33 AM]

Download PDF
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT October 20, 2011 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court JOHN DOE, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 10-2102 v. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, Defendant - Appellant. ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING Before BRISCOE, Chief Judge, EBEL and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges. It has come to the attention of the Court that the “Administrative Instruction” of the City of Albuquerque banning registered sex offenders from using any of its public libraries may have been rescinded in favor of a new substantively different Administrative Instruction. That presents the possibility that this case, and this appeal, may have been rendered moot. The Court requests simultaneous briefing from both parties providing the Court with a copy of the revocation of the original Administrative Instruction and a copy of the new Administrative Instruction, together with the date when the original Administrative Instruction was rescinded and the date when the new Administrative Instruction was enacted. In addition, the Court orders the parties to provide legal briefing on whether this action may have mooted the case and the appeal. The legal briefs shall not exceed ten pages in length and they should be due simultaneously by the close of business on Tuesday, November 29, 2011. Entered for the Court, ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?