USA v. Craig Russell
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 05-16593 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________
FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT July 18, 2006 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 05-00016-CR-4-RH-WCS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CRAIG RUSSELL, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _________________________ (July 18, 2006) Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal presents one issue: whether supervised release standard
condition No. 13 delegates a judicial function to the district court's probation office. We resolved this issue in United States v. Nash, 438 F.3d 1302, 1306 (11th Cir. 2006).1 "Standard Condition Thirteen . . . does not improperly delegate a judicial function to a probation officer. . . ." Id. at 1306. AFFIRMED.
The mandate in Nash issued on April 14, 2006. 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?