USA v. Humberto Pisa-Bentancur


Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Humberto Pisa-Bentancur. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam.

Download PDF
USA v. Humberto Pisa-Bentancur Doc. 0 Case: 10-10310 Date Filed: 12/17/2010 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-10310 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT DECEMBER 17, 2010 JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00423-RAL-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HUMBERTO PISA-BENTANCUR, Defendant - Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (December 17, 2010) Before EDMONDSON, BLACK, and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. Case: 10-10310 Date Filed: 12/17/2010 Page: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Humberto Pisa-Bentancur (Defendant) appeals his total 24-month sentence for conspiring to transport at least six illegal aliens within the United States, transporting six illegal aliens within the United States, being an alien in the United States without the consent of the U.S. Attorney General after deportation, and entering the United States at a place not designated. The district court heard Defendant's arguments about Mexico, his family circumstances, and lack of criminal history. Defendant's sentence was not substantively unreasonable, as the district court acted within its discretion in determining that a 24-month total sentence, which was the lowest possible guideline range sentence, was sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with the 18 U.S.C. 3553(a) factors. AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?