AFCE v. THG Restaurant Group, LLC, et al

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellants Woodrow A. Hall and THG Restaurant Group, LLC. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam.

Download PDF
AFCE v. THG Restaurant Group, LLC, et al Doc. 0 Case: 10-13576 Date Filed: 03/04/2011 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 10-13576 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 4, 2011 JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-01772-TWT AFC ENTERPRISES, INC., lllllllllllllllllllll versus THG RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC, WOODROW A. HALL, llllllllllllllllllll l ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________ (March 4, 2011) Before WILSON, FAY and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Defendants - Appellants. Plaintiff - Appellee, Dockets.Justia.com Case: 10-13576 Date Filed: 03/04/2011 Page: 2 of 2 Appellant operated a Popeyes Chicken and Biscuits restaurant pursuant to a franchise agreement with the appellee. As a result of alleged defaults by appellants, appellee successfully obtained a TRO followed by a preliminary injunction. In granting both the district court did not require a bond. The court stated: "There is no need for the imposition of a preliminary injunction bond in this case. AFC's annual revenues exceed $100 million, and it is able to pay any judgment . . . In the event that this finding is reversed, the Court finds a bond of $25,000 would be reasonable." (D.E. 22 at 5). Appellant does not contest these findings by the district court but argues that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c) a bond is mandatory. Such is simply not the case. Under our existing precedent, it is within the discretion of the court to set the amount of the bond or to require "no security at all." Bellsouth Telecomms., Inc. v. MCIMetro Access Transmission Services, LLC, 425 F.3d 964, 971 (11th Cir. 2005). AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?