USA v. Jaime Gonzalez, et al

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellants Jaime Gonzalez and Maria Elena Gonzalez in 10-15403, Appellant Sigma Land Corporation in 10-15404, Appellant Union Four Corporation, S.A. in 10-15419, Appellant Montego Land Corporation in 10-15422. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. [10-15403, 10-15404, 10-15419, 10-15422]

Case: 10-15403

Date Filed: 04/23/2012

Page: 1 of 4

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FILED
________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
APRIL 23, 2012
No. 10-15403
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK

D.C. Docket No. 1:99-cv-00672-FAM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAIME GONZALEZ,
MARIA ELENA GONZALEZ,
Defendants-Appellants.
________________________
No. 10-15404
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:99-cv-00669-FAM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

Case: 10-15403

Date Filed: 04/23/2012

Page: 2 of 4

SIGMA LAND CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
No. 10-15419
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:00-cv-03983-FAM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
UNION FOUR CORPORATION, S.A.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
No. 10-15422
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:96-cv-01813-FAM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MONTEGO LAND CORPORATION,
2

Case: 10-15403

Date Filed: 04/23/2012

Page: 3 of 4

a Florida corporation,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(April 23, 2012)
Before HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges, and WALTER,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, several landowners appeal the district court’s
judgments and fair-market-value findings in the government’s condemnation
claims for land used to expand Everglades National Park. After review and with
the benefit of oral argument, we conclude that the district court properly rejected
the Land Commission’s application of a 5% annual appreciation in the value of the
recreational parcels. We also conclude that the district court properly rejected the
Land Commission’s “summation approach” to valuing the parcel at issue in Appeal
No. 10-15422. Finally, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion by enforcing its pretrial order and refusing to extend the discovery
deadline or to continue the trial before the Land Commission. Accordingly, we

*

Honorable Donald E. Walter, United States District Judge for the Western District of
Louisiana, sitting by designation.
3

Case: 10-15403

Date Filed: 04/23/2012

Page: 4 of 4

affirm the judgments of the district court and its September 22, 2010 orders, which
adopted the thorough and well reasoned report and recommendation of the
magistrate judge.
AFFIRMED.

4